CODEX STAN 229-1993, Rev.1-2003 analysis of pesticide residues_ recommended methods
|
ID： |
D31F86E8864F469E968BB700793B62DC |
|
文件大小(MB)： |
0.09 |
|
页数： |
28 |
|
文件格式： |
|
|
日期： |
2010-7-21 |
|
购买： |
文本摘录（文本识别可能有误，但文件阅览显示及打印正常，pdf文件可进行文字搜索定位）：
CODEX STAN 229-1993, Rev.1-2003 Page 1 of 28,ANALYSIS OF PESTICIDE RESIDUES: RECOMMENDED METHODS,CODEX STAN 229-1993, REV.1-2003,TABLE OF CONTENTS,Page,1. INTRODUCTION .. 1,1.1 SCOPE 1,1.2 CRITERIA FOR THE SELECTION OF ANALYTICAL METHODS 1,1.3 APPLICATION OF METHODS.. 2,1.4 REFERENCES TO LITERATURE . 2,2. LIST OF METHODS OF ANALYSIS. 2,3. REFERENCES TO LITERATURE 13,3.1. GENERAL ARTICLES. 13,3.2. MANUALS. 14,3.3. INDIVIDUAL PAPERS. 16,1. INTRODUCTION,1.1 SCOPE,The analytical methods listed are those which may, from practical experience of the Codex,Committee on Pesticide Residues, be considered for the determination of pesticide residues for,regulatory purposes. The list, given in Section 2, is not exhaustive and methods not mentioned in,the list can also be applied, provided that they can be shown to produce valid results by the,analyst using them.,1.2 CRITERIA FOR THE SELECTION OF ANALYTICAL METHODS,Whenever possible, the CCPR used the following criteria when selecting analytical methods:,i. Available through national or international standards organizations, books, manuals,open literature, the internet;,ii. collaboratively studied or known to have been validated in a number of laboratories.,For single laboratory validated methods validation must have taken place according to,Guidelines on Good Practice in Pesticide Residue Analysis as a minimum;,iii. capable of determining more than one residue, i.e. multi-residue methods;,iv. suitable for as many commodities as possible at concentrations at or below the,specified MRLs;,v. applicable in a regulatory laboratory equipped with generally available analytical,instrumentation.,Preference was given to gas chromatography or high performance liquid chromatography as the,separation step for the methods. Under certain conditions however, screening methods as defined,in the Guidelines on Good Practice in Residue Analysis may be applicable. Screening methods,are indicated in the list.,CODEX STAN 229-1993, Rev.1-2003 Page 2 of 28,1.3 APPLICATION OF METHODS,Before applying the methods it will always be necessary to validate the method and to,demonstrate the competence of the analyst. There is a further need for regular verification of the,performance of the method during use. Validation and performance verification are described in,the Guidelines on Good Practice in Residue Analysis.,1.4 REFERENCES TO LITERATURE,Other relevant Codex recommendations in the field of enforcement of Codex maximum limits for,pesticide residues are as follows:,1. Recommended Methods of Sampling for the Determination of Pesticide Residues (Ref:,Codex Alimentarius Vol. 2, Section 3 ).,2. Portion of Commodities to which Codex Maximum Residue Limits apply and which should,be analysed (Ref: Codex Alimentarius Vol. 2, Section 4.1).,3. Explanatory Notes on Codex Maximum Limits for Pesticide Residues (Ref: Codex,Alimentarius Vol. 2, Section 1).,4. Codex Guidelines on Good Practice in Pesticide Residue Analysis. (Ref: Codex,Alimentarius Suppl 1 to vol, 2. Section 4).,In paragraph 3 references can be found to:,?general articles on pesticide residue methodology (paragraph 3.1);,?manuals (paragraph 3.2);,?individual papers (paragraph 3.3).,After each reference given in paragraph 3.3, the compounds to which the methods involved apply,are indicated by their CCPR number.,2. LIST OF METHODS OF ANALYSIS,The numbers refer to the manuals and books listed in paragraph 3.2, the names to the (first) author,of the papers listed in paragraph 3.3.,CCPR,number,Compound References,001 aldrin/dieldrin 1a, 1n, 1o, 1p, 2a, 2d, 2f, 3, 4 (XII-5, 6; S1-5, S8-10, S12, S19), 5, 7a (5,6), 7c (S8-10, S12, S19), 8a, 8b, 8c, 8d, 9a (M1, M12), 10,Ambrus, Abbott (2), Panel (4), Stijve (2, 3),002 azinphos-methyl 2c, 2d, 2e, 2f, 3, 4 (XII-6; S5, S8, S19; 63, 63A), 7a (6), 7c (S8, S19),7d(255), 9a (M2, M5, M12), 10,Abbott (1), Ambrus, Panel (3),003 binapacryl 2a, 2d, 3, 4 (XII-4, 6; S19; 8, 43), 7a (6), 7c (S19), 9b, 10,Baker, PB (2),004 bromophos 2a, 2c, 2d, 4 (XII-3, 6; S5, S8-10, S13, S17, S19; 210, 210A), 6d, 7a (3,6), 7c (S8-10, S13, S17, S19), 9a (M2, M5, M12), 10,Abbott (1), Ambrus, Bottomley, Panel (7, 8), Stijve (7),CODEX STAN 229-1993, Rev.1-2003 Page 3 of 28,CCPR,number,Compound References,005 bromophos-ethyl 2a, 2c, 2d, 3, 4 (XII-3, 6; S8, S13, S17, S19; 263), 6d, 7a (3,6), 7c (S13,S17, S19), 9a (M2, M5, M12), 10,Abbott (1), Ambrus,006 captafol 2d, 2e, 4 (XII-6; S8, S19, S20; 266, 266A), 6d, 7a (6), 7b, 7c (S8, S19,S20), 9a (M1, M12), 10,Ambrus, Baker, PB (1), Buettler, Gilvydis, Pomerantz,007 captan 2a, 2d, 2e, 3, 4 (XII-6; S8, S12, S19, S20; 12, 12A), 7a (6), 7b, 7c (S8,S12, S19, S20), 9……
……